Seminar Archive Summaries
How the West Can Accommodate High Penetrations of Wind and Solar Power
Debra Lew, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Wednesday, November 3, 2010 | 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM | Building 420, Room 40 | Free and Open to All
What happens when you put lots of wind and solar power onto the power system? Do you need more storage? Do you need more reserves? When does the system 'break'? What actions can be taken to integrate wind and solar power into the power system without large cost increases to consumers?
Wind and solar power are inherently variable and uncertain. This causes difficulties for power system operators who must maintain reliability. Over the past several years, utilities and researchers have simulated power system operation with various penetration levels of renewable energy, examining increased costs due to integration of the renewables and mitigation measures to more cost-effectively accommodating the renewables. Debbie will present an overview of recent renewable energy integration studies in the US and Europe. She will focus on the recently released Western Wind and Solar Integration Study, one of the largest wind and solar integration studies to date, that examines the integration of up to 35% wind and solar energy into the power system. Issues addressed include: utility cooperation, tradeoffs between local and remote renewable energy resources, geographic diversity, storage, reserves, and improved forecasting.
followed by a MAP Energy Social (details announced at the seminar)
Related Themes:Assessing the Size of the Deepwater Horizons Oil Spill
Steve Wereley, Purdue University
Wednesday, October 27, 2010 | 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM | Building 420, Room 40 | Free and Open to All
On May 13 Professor Wereley used optical feature tracking to estimate the volume flow of oil from the on-going BP Macondo oil field spill. Several other independent scientists also performed similar measurements at about the same time. These several measurements were all in the ballpark of 20,000-100,000 barrels per day--greatly in excess of the estimates provided by BP of 5,000 barrels per day. The unforeseen effect of these first independent flow rate calculations was to bring the issue of oil flow rate to the fore. Wereley was subsequently appointed to a government task force called the Flow Rate Technical Group (FRTG) to calculate an official government flow rate estimate. The group arrived at a final estimate of 35,000-60,000 barrels of oil per day after requesting and receiving better quality and longer videos of the oil flow. In conjunction with the Department of Energy and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, the FRTG arrived at a final total crude oil release estimate of 4.9 million barrels—over 200 million gallons or nearly 20 Exxon Valdez-type accidents. This presentation/discussion will center on those calculations, their limitations, their improvement and their future uses in this on-going disaster.
Part 3: Miniseries on Energy Impact
Related Themes:AB32 and Proposition 23
Thomas Steyer
Co-Managing Partner of Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C.
and
Thomas W. and Susan B. Ford Distinguished Fellow
Chair, Energy Policy Task Force
Member of the Working Group on Economic Policy
Hoover Institution, Stanford University
Wednesday, October 20, 2010 | 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM | Building 420, Room 40 | Free and Open to All
![]() Thomas Steyer |
|
|||
followed by an Energy Social (details announced at the seminar)
Well-Being, Consumption, and Climate Change Commitment
Noah Diffenbaugh, Stanford University
Wednesday, October 13, 2010 | 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM | Building 420, Room 40 | Free and Open to All
Part 2: Miniseries on Energy Impact
Governments are currently considering policies that will limit greenhouse gas concentrations, including negotiation of an international treaty to replace the expiring Kyoto Protocol. Designing effective climate change mitigation and adaptation measures requires rigorous, comprehensive, detailed analyses of the response of climate dynamics to elevated greenhouse gas concentrations, and of the potential impacts of those climate changes on natural and human systems. Using a high-resolution climate modeling system, we find that the potential impacts of very high greenhouse gas concentrations are largest where critical thresholds are crossed, with fine-scale climate processes amplifying the climate change – and therefore the impacts – in many regions. We also find that substantial intensification of hot extremes could occur within the next 3 decades, below the 2 ˚C global warming target currently being considered by policy makers. However, the critical importance of energy consumption to human development and well-being creates a tension for both development priorities and climate policy. Indeed, we find that closing the gap in energy consumption between rich and poor populations via intensive consumption and emissions profiles causes global warming of 1.75 to 4.75 ˚C, along with seasonal warming that exceeds two standard deviations of interannual variability over most land areas. This level of climate change is independent of any future emissions by the 28 countries that exhibit the highest levels of well-being at present, suggesting that simultaneously ensuring human well-being and avoiding dangerous climate change requires intensive efforts to enable low-carbon energy consumption.
No video or speaker slides available
Related Themes:Precourt Institute for Energy at Stanford: The Grand Challenge
Lynn Orr, Keleen and Carlton Beal Professor in Petroleum Engineering, Energy Resources Engineering Department Director, Precourt Institute for Energy
Panelists:
- Zhi-Xun Shen, Stanford Institute for Materials & Energy Science (SIMES)
- Sally Benson, Global Climate and Eneregy Project GCEP
- Stacey Bent, TomKat Center for Sustainable Energy
- Jim Sweeney, Precourt Energy Efficiency Center (PEEC)
- Frank Wolak, Program on Energy and Sustainable Development (PESD)
- Larry Goulder, Stanford Environment and Energy Policy Analysis Center (SEEPAC)
Wednesday, October 6, 2010 | 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM | Building 420, Room 40 | Free and Open to All
Franklin M. ("Lynn") Orr, Jr. became the director of the Precourt Institute for Energy at Stanford upon its establishment in 2009. He served as director of the Global Climate and Energy Project from 2002 to 2008. Orr was the Chester Naramore Dean of the School of Earth Sciences at Stanford University from 1994 to 2002. He has been a member of the Stanford faculty since 1985 and holds the Keleen and Carlton Beal Chair of Petroleum Engineering in the Department of Energy Resources Engineering, and is a Senior Fellow at the Woods Institute for the Environment. His research activities focus on how complex fluid mixtures flow in the porous rocks in the Earth's crust, the design of gas injection processes for enhanced oil recovery, and CO2 storage in subsurface formations. Orr is a member of the National Academy of Engineering. He serves as vice chair of the board of directors of the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, and he chairs the Science Advisory Committee for the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and was a foundation board member from 1999-2008.
- battery storage
- bio-fuel
- cap & trade
- carbon sequestration
- climate change
- economics
- energy and climate policy
- energy efficiency
- geothermal
- greenhouse gases
- impacts
- modeling
- nanotechnology
- natural gas
- nuclear
- ocean energy
- oil shale
- petroleum
- renewable energy
- smart grid
- solar
- tar sands
- transportation fuel
- wind
Panel: The Energy Innovation Ecosystem
Note different time and location - 3:45-5:15pm, McCaw Hall
Moderated by Andrew Revkin, Dot Earth
Panelists:
- John Krenicki, President and CEO, GE Energy
- Roy Johnson, former CEO, Calisolar
- Dick Swanson, President Emeritus and CTO, SunPower
- Uma Chowdhry, Senior Vice President and Chief Science and Technology Officer, DuPont
Held in conjunction with the GCEP Annual Research Symposium
Wednesday, September 29, 2010 | 03:45 PM - 05:15 PM | McCaw Hall, Frances C. Arrillaga Alumni Center | Free and Open to All
Andrew Revkin, editor of Dot Earth, will moderate a discussion with leaders from industry about the opportunities for businesses and countries to participate in the energy economy and the "energy innovation ecosystem" that will be needed to stimulate, support, and sustain innovation in the energy sector. This panel takes place in conjunction with the Annual Global Climate and Energy Project (GCEP) Research Symposium which this year has the theme of “Creating a Sustainable Energy System for the 21st Century and Beyond”.
Related Themes:Cleaning Up Our Industrial Past to Create a Better Future
Janeen S. Judah, President, Chevron Environmental Management Company
Wednesday, September 22, 2010 | 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM | Building 420, Room 40 | Free and Open to All
Part 1: Miniseries on Energy Impact
Centuries of economic growth have boosted living standards, improved health and created opportunities for humankind – but global industrial development has also left behind tracts of contaminated land.
Cleaning up these "brownfield" lands is a complex, multi-billion dollar business involving agencies, responsible parties, consultants and other stakeholders. Businesses and communities face cleanup challenges and sometimes multiple options to re-use renewed sites, such as habitat restoration, industrial or commercial redevelopment, housing and renewable energy projects. But for many sites, cleanup and reuse are difficult or impossible using today’s technologies.
Chevron spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually on environmental cleanup at sites of former service stations, oil refineries, chemical plants, oil fields, pipelines and other operations. The work is performed by Chevron Environmental Management Company (EMC), founded in 1998 to manage the company's legacy cleanup responsibilities. EMC focuses on cost-efficient, technically-sound remediation and on protecting the environment and public health. It works in partnership with communities and government on solutions that provide local benefit and are grounded in sound science, and invests in better remediation technologies. EMC promotes beneficial reuses ranging from condominiums to warehouses, and solar energy generation to constructed wetlands. Through a dedication to environmental stewardship, Chevron is committed to cleaning up the past, but we view our responsibility also as a major opportunity to create a better future.
followed by an Energy Social (details announced at the seminar)
No video or speaker slides available
Public Policies That Prevent Dangerous Climate Change and Catalyze Sustainable Global Prosperity
Hal Harvey, Chief Executive Officer, ClimateWorks
Wednesday, June 2, 2010 | 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM | Building 420, Room 40 | Free and Open to All
Abstract:
What public policies can prevent dangerous climate change and catalyze sustainable global prosperity? Hal Harvey, CEO of the ClimateWorks Foundation, will discuss the urgency of mitigating climate change, how to craft and implement approaches to the problem that achieve results, and the costs of delaying action.
The ClimateWorks Foundation supports public policies that prevent dangerous climate change and catalyze sustainable global prosperity. The foundation’s goal is to limit annual global greenhouse gas emissions to 44 billion metric tons by the year 2020 (25 percent below projections) and 35 billion metric tons by the year 2030 (50 percent below projections). These ambitious targets require immediate and widespread adoption of smart policies that rapidly improve energy efficiency, scale up the deployment of clean energy technologies, and halt the destruction of tropical forests. The ClimateWorks Network is a global family of organizations that focus on effective policies in the nations, regions, and economic sectors responsible for most greenhouse gas emissions—thus increasing our chances of success.
Related Themes:Nanostructuring for Efficient Energy Conversion
Stacey Bent, Co-Director, Energy Frontier Research Center, Stanford University
Wednesday, May 26, 2010 | 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM | Building 420, Room 40 | Free and Open to All
Stacey Bent, co-Director of the Center on Nanostructuring for Efficient Energy Conversion (CNEEC), discusses the research strategies of the center. CNEEC is a new Energy Frontier Research Center (EFRC) established by the Department of Energy at Stanford University, with partners at the Danish Technical University, Carnegie Institution, and HRL Laboratories.
No single technology can meet the world’s growing energy needs while reducing emission of greenhouse gases. A collection of energy technologies must work in concert to produce, store, and consume the 20 TW of energy that humans will soon demand. However, the diverse energy devices needed, such as photovoltaics, fuel cells, and batteries, exploit similar physical and chemical phenomena. CNEEC seeks to understand and solve these cross-cutting fundamental problems at the nanoscale to achieve improved energy conversion efficiency. This talk will describe how the work in the Center aims to change materials properties such as light absorption, charge transport, and catalytic activity that are critically important for many energy conversion systems.
No video available.
Does Biochar Deliver Carbon-Negative Energy?
Johannes Lehmann, Associate Professor of Soil Biogeochemistry and Soil Fertility Management, Cornell University
Wednesday, May 19, 2010 | 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM | Building 420, Room 40 | Free and Open to All
Averting dangerous climate change was central to the agenda in Copenhagen, but viable strategies to meet energy needs and at the same time reduce greenhouse gas emissions have not been sufficiently explored. Agricultural carbon provides tremendous theoretical opportunity, but just how to weave carbon sequestration by soils into modern carbon management is not clear. Biochar systems may offer a theoretical way forward, but have been met with as much criticism as enthusiasm. Some herald biochar as the sole solution that can save us from climate collapse, while others see a scam of global proportions looming, or at best a failure as through past efforts to use biomass for energy. Whether friend or foe, scientific inquiry is starting to provide some answers to the most contentious issues. Basic assumptions have been addressed and show the site dependency that can be expected from managing agricultural landscapes and complex feedstock streams. But final assessment is still outstanding and will depend on evaluation of biochar systems at scale of implementation. The complexity of biochar systems may be both a strength in its ability to address multiple sustainability issues, but also a challenge in timely and global implementation.





